2026 Bahrain F1 Pre-Season Testing Week 2

The 2026 Formula 1 era didn’t just arrive in Bahrain; it screamed into existence, silencing the skeptics who feared these new hybrid monsters would be slower than a Sunday drive in a Prius. After a week of data-crunching, turbo-lag-induced grid start attempts, and a literal "Macarena" being performed by Ferrari’s rear wing, the pecking order is more easily discernible. Or at least, we think it is... We’ve traded the convergence of 2025 for a stark, two-class society where the elite four are playing chess while the rest of the grid is still trying to figure out how to put game pieces on the board. If testing taught us anything, it’s that the 2026 regulations haven't killed innovation; they’ve just made it more expensive, more complex, and a hell of a lot more unpredictable.

We sifted through sources and came out with some bold predictions on the pecking order, what makes them stand out, what they struggle with and where we think they sit.

Starting from the top…

1. Mercedes

The Silver Arrows spent the week looking less like a team testing a car and more like a tech giant in "stealth mode" before a massive IPO. While they didn't chase the headline-grabbing lap times, the paddock is buzzing about what they're hiding under the hood. Their dynamic consistency made the W17 look like it was on rails, even when everyone else was fighting the wind.

The Engine is a Beast: Paddock whispers suggest their new power unit utilizes a 16:1 compression ratio that stays stable even at peak operating temps—essentially the "holy grail" of the new regs.

Glued to the Tarmac: Trackside observers noted that George Russell could attack corners with a level of aggression and stability that rivals simply couldn't match.

Sandbagging 101: Mercedes avoided low-fuel runs entirely, opting for methodical system checks that scream, "We know we’re fast, we don’t need to show you."

Start-Line Struggles: The lack of MGU-H means turbo lag is the new enemy. Russell described his practice starts as "the worst of his career," a sentiment shared by many but felt acutely here.

Reliability Niggles: Minor pneumatic issues cost Kimi Antonelli some seat time, proving that even the best-engineered machines have 2026 teething pains.

Prediction: Expect Mercedes to lock out the front row in Melbourne. They have the most "reserve" performance of any team.

Timeline: They’ll likely dominate the first European leg as they refine their energy deployment software, potentially gapping the field by mid-summer.

2. Ferrari

Ferrari arrived in Bahrain and decided that "subtle" wasn't in their vocabulary. Between Charles Leclerc’s blistering 1:31.992 lap and a rear wing that looks like it belongs on a fighter jet, the Scuderia is officially back in the championship conversation. Ferrari fans would say “We’re so back.”

Pure, Unadulterated Pace: Setting the fastest lap of the test isn't everything, but doing it while looking that stable is a massive statement of intent.

The "Macarena" Wing: Their active rear wing—which rotates up to 270 degrees to dump drag—is the undisputed technical marvel of the paddock.

Launch King: Thanks to a smaller, more responsive turbocharger design, Ferrari's practice starts were the most consistent and explosive on the grid.

Rear-End Jitters: The car still has a tendency to slide on corner exit, a trait that could eat through tires during a long stint in the Australian heat.

Full Disclosure: Unlike Mercedes, Ferrari likely showed about 95% of their hand. There's less "hidden" time left to find before Race 1.

Prediction: A podium in Melbourne is a lock, with a genuine shot at the win if they can jump Mercedes off the line.

Timeline: They need to keep the development race alive; Ferrari’s historic weakness is being out-developed by autumn. 2026 needs to be different.

3. McLaren

The defending champs aren't sweating quite yet. While they’ve had a few "customer team" headaches, their race sims were nothing short of clinical. Oscar Piastri looks like a man who found a new gear, and the MCL40 looks ready to defend its crown.

Race Pace Excellence: Piastri’s long runs were the gold standard of the week, showing minimal tire deg and lap times that made Max Verstappen take notice.

Refinement over Revolution: McLaren arrived with a very "complete" car, spending the week tweaking setups rather than fixing fundamental flaws.

Starting Procedure Mastery: Lando Norris spent more time practicing starts than anyone else, seemingly cracking the code of the 5-second turbo spool-up.

Engine Lag Gap: Running a non-final spec of the Mercedes engine meant they were slightly down on top-end power compared to the works team.

Harvesting Hurdles: As a customer, they are still a few weeks behind Mercedes in perfectly optimizing how the car harvests energy under braking.

Prediction: Third-fastest in qualifying, but a massive threat for the win in Melbourne due to superior tire management.

Timeline: Once they get the "final" Mercedes engine spec in Australia, they should be neck-and-neck with the works team by Round 4 unless Mercedes is guilty of sandbagging.

4. Red Bull

Life after the "Honda era" was supposed to be a struggle, but the new Red Bull-Ford partnership seems to be doing just fine. The car is still "The Max Verstappen Show," designed with a razor-sharp front end that only a triple-champion could love.

Ford Power is Real: Any fears about the in-house engine program were put to bed; the PU was bulletproof and showed top-tier straight-line speed.

Verstappen's Comfort Zone: Max looked bored, which is usually a bad sign for everyone else. He was immediately on the pace and happy with the car’s balance.

Straight-Line Rockets: The aero-drag reduction on the RB22 is top-class, making them arguably the hardest car to overtake on the straights.

The Second Seat Curse: Rookie Isack Hadjar lost significant time to coolant leaks, leaving him undercooked for the most complex season in a decade.

Handling on a Knife Edge: The car requires extreme downshifting to harvest energy, making it incredibly unstable for anyone who isn't Max.

Prediction: Max fights for the win; Hadjar fights to stay in the points.

Timeline: Expect a massive upgrade package in Spain. Red Bull knows they’re currently the fourth-fastest team and won't stand for it.

5. Haas

In a shock to absolutely everyone, Haas didn't just show up—they performed. They’ve successfully navigated the "middle-class" of F1 to emerge as potentially the best of the rest. The days of being a mobile chicane are, for now, over.

Bulletproof Reliability: They logged more miles than almost anyone else, a complete 180-degree turn from their historically chaotic pre-seasons.

The Ocon Effect: Esteban Ocon’s race sims were shockingly fast, consistently putting Haas at the top of the midfield "Class B" rankings.

Operational Swagger: The garage looked like a top-tier team—fast turnarounds, no panic, and a clear development plan also matching race starts with the Ferrari’s smaller turbo.

The 1-Second Chasm: Even as the "best of the rest," they are still a full second per lap slower than the top four. That’s a massive gap to bridge.

Entry Issues: Drivers complained of front-locking under heavy braking, a mechanical balance issue that still needs ironing out.

Prediction: A double-points finish in Melbourne is highly likely if the top four have any reliability issues.

Timeline: The real test comes in May. Haas usually starts strong but fades; they need to prove their 2026 development budget can keep up.

6. Alpine

After a disastrous 2024 and 2025, Alpine’s "strategic pivot" to Mercedes power units looks like a stroke of genius. They’ve gone from the back of the bus to a seat in the middle, and the atmosphere in the garage has shifted from "funeral" to "focused."

Weight Management: Alpine is one of the few teams to actually hit the minimum weight limit, giving them "free" lap time over their heavier rivals.

Drivability is Back: Pierre Gasly noted the Mercedes PU is a dream compared to their old hardware, allowing for much smoother energy deployment.

Competitive Midfield Pace: They are in a dead heat with Haas for the P5/P6 spot, proving their "no development" strategy last year paid off.

Sacrificed the Past: The team essentially gave up on two seasons to build this car; if they don't score big points early, the pressure will be immense.

Electrical Gremlins: Franco Colapinto’s sessions were marred by small sensor failures, a sign that the Mercedes integration isn't 100% seamless yet.

Prediction: A scrap with Haas for the final points positions in Australia.

Timeline: They need to spend the first six races optimizing their aero package. The chassis is good; it just needs more downforce.

7. Racing Bulls (RB)

The "Junior" Red Bull team had a Jekyll and Hyde testing period. Week one was a mess of integration issues, but week two saw them find a rhythm that should keep them safely in the midfield scrap.

Rookie Resilience: Arvid Lindblad was a lap-machine, doing 165 laps in a single day. That's the kind of data-gathering that saves a season.

Punchy Power: They share the Red Bull-Ford engine, which has proven to be surprisingly stout in the high-speed sections.

Upward Trajectory: Each day their lap times dropped significantly, suggesting they are learning the car's setup window faster than their rivals.

Clunky Dynamics: The car looks "heavy" in the corners, lacking the nimble rotation seen in the Haas or the top-four cars.

Data Deficit: The early unreliability in week one means they are still playing catch-up on their long-run tire data.

Prediction: A fringe points contender in Melbourne, likely benefiting from others' DNFs.

Timeline: By the time we hit the high-speed tracks in Europe, the RB chassis should be dialed in enough to challenge Alpine and Haas regularly.

8. Audi

The Audi era has officially begun, and while it wasn't a fairy tale, it wasn't a horror story either. Building your own engine and chassis from scratch is a monumental task, and Audi is currently in the "respectable but unrefined" phase.

Development Intent: The sidepod upgrades they brought mid-test were some of the most aggressive in the pit lane, showing Audi isn't afraid to spend.

Sneaky Long-Run Pace: Nico Hulkenberg’s race simulations were actually better than their qualifying pace suggested, putting them right in the midfield mix.

High Mileage: Despite early engine scares, they finished the test with nearly 5,000km of data.

Proprietary Teething: The brand-new Audi engine and gearbox had several "communication issues" that led to stalls and lost track time.

The Sound of Chaos: Trackside, the Audi engine sounds "unconventional," and the car looks like a handful to drive at the limit.

Prediction: A tough qualifying followed by a solid race that narrowly misses out on points.

Timeline: This is a three-year project. Expect incremental gains every race as they figure out their own engine maps.

9. Williams

Williams is currently the student who showed up to the final exam after missing the last three weeks of class. Missing the Barcelona shakedown has put them in a massive hole, and while the car is fundamentally "fine," it's currently on a diet that hasn't started yet.

Chassis Foundations: When it is running, the car looks balanced and predictable. It doesn't have the nasty snaps that plague Aston Martin.

Driver Feedback: Having Carlos Sainz and Alex Albon is a massive safety net. Their feedback is helping the team prioritize which fires to put out first.

Reliability Recovery: Once they got on track in Bahrain, the car actually ran quite well, allowing them to finally do some long-run testing.

The Weight Problem: The car is significantly over the minimum weight limit. In F1 terms, they’re carrying a backpack full of bricks.

Pace Deficit: Because of the weight and missed data, they are currently languishing at the back of the "established" teams.

Prediction: A difficult weekend in Melbourne where they prioritize finishing the race over pure speed.

Timeline: Once the "B-spec" lightweight chassis arrives (likely by Silverstone), Williams will jump back into the P7/P8 conversation.

10. Cadillac

Welcome to the big leagues, Cadillac. They aren't fast, but they are professional. They’ve proven they belong on the grid, even if they’re currently the ones being lapped.

Operationally Sound: The team functions like they’ve been here for years. No garage fires, no missed sessions, just methodical work.

Launch Masters: Surprisingly, Cadillac has nailed the 2026 start procedure (thanks to the Ferrari PU). Their practice launches were among the cleanest on the grid.

Safety Margin: They are comfortably within the 107% qualifying rule, silencing the critics who said they’d be too slow to compete.

Aero Void: The car simply lacks downforce. You can see the drivers wrestling the wheel through every high-speed corner.

Slowest of the Bunch: On pure pace, they are about 4 seconds off the lead. That’s an eternity in modern F1.

Prediction: Qualifying P19 and P20, but finishing the race to gather data.

Timeline: 2026 is a learning year. Expect them to be among the "last" teams on the grid until they can overhaul their aero department for 2027.

11. Aston Martin

The "Green Team" is currently in full-blown crisis mode. Despite having Adrian Newey’s genius in the building, you can’t design your way out of a car that refuses to run. They are starting the season in a hole so deep they might need a ladder.

The Newey Factor: The car’s floor design is reportedly light-years ahead of the field; if they can ever get it to work, the potential is massive.

Pragmatic Realism: They ended the test early to save parts and focus on the simulator—a "glass half full" way of saying they had no other choice.

Financial Might: They have the money to fix this. It’s not a death sentence, just a very painful birth.

Disastrous Reliability: 128 laps in an entire week is a catastrophe. They have zero data on how the tires behave over a race distance.

The Spinning Top: The car suffers from unpredictable rear-axle lockups. Watching an Aston Martin go through a braking zone is currently a game of Russian Roulette.

Prediction: A double DNF in Melbourne. The car is simply too fragile and unpredictable right now.

Timeline: Expect a "Season 2.0" to start around the Canadian Grand Prix. They need months to fix these gearbox and engine integration issues.

The 2026 Bahrain test wasn't just a shakedown; it was a reality check. The new regulations have successfully introduced a level of technical variety we haven't seen in years. Between the extreme energy management required by the lack of MGU-H and the strategic gamble of active aerodynamics, the driver is once again at the center of the story. The cars are fast, the "two-class" grid is real, and the start of the Australian Grand Prix—with 22 cars trying to spool up turbos simultaneously—promises to be the most chaotic three minutes in the history of the sport. We came to Bahrain looking for answers; we left with the realization that in 2026, the only constant is going to be the unexpected.

Today’s email was created by Alan at Grid Geeks. A partner of Sim Racing Nation.

Was this email forwarded to you? Sign up here.

Reply

Avatar

or to participate

Keep Reading